Our GreenThink blog shares design and building techniques, trends and innovations that maximize energy efficiency, save money, create homes that are more durable and have better air quality, and protect the environment.
Posted February 12, 2018 by Rob Nicely
One thing we know for sure is that the building sector accounts for about 32% of global energy use, 25% of global energy related CO2 emissions, and 51% of global electricity consumption—that last figure is 70% in the U.S. (based on 2010 data). Another thing we’ve come to know, and prove, is that standards like Passive House can bring down the energy demand of a home by around 80%. While photovoltaic panels help supplement remaining power needs during sunny periods, the issue of storage keeps homes on the power grid for at least some of the year.
Another key factor in reducing carbon emissions that lead to climate change is the switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy resources. Efforts are underway to increase the percentage of renewable energy sources in the mix. A State mandate requires PG&E to derive one-third of its electricity from renewable energy resources by 2020. That mandate increases to 50% by 2030. When people use a greener mix, say with Monterey Bay Community Power, and reinvest local profits into additional renewable energy sources, we can increase the availability of renewable energy sources over time.
Inspired in part by impressive advances in the efficiencies of renewable energy generation, paired with the urgency of meeting global climate change goals, Passive House Institute initiated a review of non-renewable energy use in buildings in 2013. Previous calculations for Primary Energy needed updating, especially as they favored the use of natural gas over electricity. Primary Energy accounts for all the source energy used by a building, including the amount of energy it takes to generate and deliver power to the site where it’s used. While less power is lost in getting natural gas to the point of use, it’s a combustion fuel source and will always create greenhouse gasses. It was the realization that about two-thirds of all electricity is consumed just in getting to the point of use that led to two new levels of certification: Passive House Plus and Passive House Premium. Passive House Plus and Premium calculations take into account the addition of renewable energy resources to the mix. The new certification levels provide the incentive of achieving a higher standard in building performance. And that’s good for the homeowners and the planet.
So far, we’ve built two homes to Passive House standards, one in Carmel which was Central California’s first PHIUS+ Certified Passive House, also LEED Platinum certified; and one in Pacific Grove crafted to achieve Certified Passive House status by the Passive House Academy as well as LEED Gold certification. In December 2017, we embarked on our most ambitious project…so far. With a certified Passive House Designer on the project team, we are crafting a Monterey home to achieve Passive House Plus, LEED Platinum and Net Zero Energy certifications. A second project, this one in Carmel Valley, will launch this summer and be designed to achieve the same certifications. We’ll report on the progress of these projects as we begin construction in June this year. As always, feel free to send me an email: email@example.com or use the new Ask CBD feature on our website.
Seeing into the future of home performance
Posted January 29, 2018 by Rob Nicely
Building has traditionally relied on “rule of thumb”—we’ve learned to do things a certain way and get a predictable outcome based on past results. In our firm, we continue to try different techniques to achieve a target for the home’s performance in terms of energy efficiency. Having completed extensive training mentioned in our last blog, and using the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP), we can now be exact in how we build the home for energy performance.
PHPP is sophisticated energy modeling software that enables us to precisely determine the desired performance of the home. We input data including specs like the exact assembly of walls, ceiling and floors, the direction the home is facing and the R value of the insulation we plan to use. We also enter the location and the software gathers climate data from NOAA or other local source to show how much sun is at the house day in and day out. Then, we “build” the house in the software to see how it’s going to perform from an energy standpoint and how much photovoltaic we would need to achieve Net Zero Energy. This precision enables us to make adjustments before construction begins.
Once construction is complete, we do a blower door test to confirm results. PHPP enables greater accuracy and precision than we could possibly achieve without the computing power.
Training – laying the foundation for building a greener future
Posted November 9, 2017 by Rob Nicely
Building sustainably, green, responsibly or whatever you choose to call it, is a specialized craft. One that we’ve chosen as our standard way to build. One that needs to be done right if it’s to achieve its overall aim of increasing energy efficiency and lowering carbon emissions that are harmful to people and the planet. I am no longer content with energy efficient, high-quality, healthy and durable homes being the exception. I want the building industry to embrace these principles as the standard way to build. We’ve done homes like this before and there’s an ever-increasing number of buildings—including residential, commercial, institutional, even industrial—being built around the U.S. and around the world using Passive House, LEED and Net Zero Energy protocols. And more and more homeowners are looking for building professionals who are qualified to provide true green building services.
The kind of design and construction we do requires ongoing training and education. At all levels of our company. Every person involved in building or remodeling a home has to be on the same page and do their part to achieve a finished product that meets our high standards for energy efficiency, healthy indoor air, quality and comfort. As sustainable practices and protocols like Passive House make their way into the building industry mainstream and we continue to develop and implement standards that exceed industry norms, we’re all in for keeping our staff, and our company, at the forefront of this vital movement.
To date, we have sent 15 members of our staff through Build It Green’s Certified Green Building Professional (CGBP) course. And our intention is to train 100% of our team in these overarching principles of green building and the systems approach to the design, construction and operation of residential buildings. The course provides an understanding of energy efficiency, resource conservation and indoor air quality, and how we can effectively convey the importance of these building principles to homeowners. This green building 101 program gives our staff a solid foundation on which to build expertise in the Progressive Building Practices that are standard at CBD.
Hal Petersen, project and site manager for CBD, recently completed the Certified Green Building Professional course. “After taking this training course, I realized that there were a number of things I hadn’t totally understood before,” says Hal. “There are many things that we already do here and we’re implementing more and more of these practices into our standard protocols. It was a pretty intense 16-hour course and exam covering everything from insulation, air sealing, framing and energy systems to sustainable lumber, windows, gray water and VOCs, even practices like using nails instead of toxic glues to install hardwood flooring. I now have more knowledge and a broader perspective of how to employ these principles in each project.”
In the next in our series on the importance of education and training, we’ll talk about the North American Passive House Network’s Certified Passive House Designer/Consultant course that two of our staff and I completed in October. We are in the process of testing and certification. In addition, we have a Certified Passive House Designer on our team. That means we have more expertise to make this area’s built environment more harmonious with the natural environment.
Stay tuned. And as always, feel free to send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org if you want more information.
Your daily dose of building science
Posted October 17, 2017 by Matt Hanner, Pre-Production Manager
We recently started work on a remodel. When we attempted to perform a blower door test, the house had so many air leaks we couldn’t achieve a measurable number. Once the internal wall finishes were removed, I saw this and thought I’d pass along a lesson learned.
One of the interesting things about spiders is that they prefer to build webs where there is air flow. It makes sense when you think about it. The air blowing through the web acts as a highway to bring a greater amount of food into the web. In the photo you can see a great example of this. In the stud bay at the center of the photo you can actually see daylight coming in through the wall. As a result, this was the favored bay for the spiders to build their webs. You’ll notice the bay to the left has a minimum air barrier of just tar paper, and far fewer webs. When you walk through the house, you can spot the air leaks quickly by looking for the spider webs. Fewer spiders and webs — yet another side benefit of air sealing.
You may be asking, “Why should I attend the North American Passive House Network conference and what’s in it for me?” I can answer honestly…a great deal. There’s a heightened awareness of the building industry’s ability to turn the tide of carbon emissions that are influencing climate change; and move to greater dependence on renewable energy resources. In 2010, the building sector accounted for 32% of global energy use; 25% of energy related CO2 emissions; 51% of global electricity consumption…And in the U.S. that last figure was 70%! Building-related emissions more than doubled since 1970 and are expected to double, or even triple again by mid-century.
Given these figures as a backdrop, we need to take responsibility for our role in reducing carbon emissions.
Passive House has been proven to reduce the energy demand of buildings by around 80%. We’re talking new construction, remodels and retrofits of every type of building whether residential, commercial or industrial. By significantly reducing the energy demand of buildings, Passive House can also help ease the transition to a grid supply based on renewable energy.
Cities and states around the country are not only incorporating Passive House standards into policies as a way to meet aggressive energy reduction (and as a result, carbon footprint) mandates, they are leading by example. At last year’s NAPHN conference in New York City, a number of cities, including Vancouver and New York, revealed that they are requiring city-owned capital projects to be designed to use at least 50% less energy than current standards dictate. And it wasn’t just the “plans” that were outlined at the conference, the “results” of completed projects and initiatives provided solid proof that these strategies work.
Innovations in technologies, materials and services are increasingly prolific, making Passive House more feasible, affordable and relevant than ever before.
Unless you live a building-free lifestyle, you need to be part of this conversation—especially if you’re in some aspect of the building industry. The conference is a venue for meeting, sharing and learning about actual, real and practical ways strategies like Passive House are changing the built environment. It provides a chance to talk openly, honestly and scientifically about the issue of climate change and the role of strategies like Passive House and renewables. Most of us at some point have learned to soft-pedal the issue, not boldly speaking up for fear of being perceived as hysterical or fanatic. It’s more critical now than ever to bestraightforward and honest about the science that proves the planet is in trouble.
The point is that there’s a growing movement to protect and preserve the planet.As part of the building industry, we have both a role and a responsibility to learn, lead and leverage all the knowledge, evidence and proven strategies at our disposal. Passive House is one that we know works.
Click here for more information on the conference.
Figure 1. Renewable energy sources are incentivized with PER factors (Logo use with permission, PHI. Original Illustration by author.)
If you’ve been puzzled by the proliferation of ‘net,’ ‘nearly’ and ‘almost ready’ Zero Energy definitions and standards and have wondered just how net or nearly they truly are, take heart. The Passive House Institute (PHI) has introduced an equitable assessment of energy use to help guide us toward the 100% renewable energy future our State—and planet—must rapidly achieve.
Inspired in part by the impressive leaps in the efficiencies of renewable energy generation, coupled with the urgency of meeting global climate change goals, PHI initiated a review of non-renewable energy use in buildings in 2013. They recognized that their previous calculations for Primary Energy needed updating, especially as they favored the use of natural gas over electricity. (Primary Energy accounts for all the source energy used by a building, including the amount of energy it takes to generate and transmit power to the building site.) PHI recognized that non-renewable forms of energy use by buildings needed to be rapidly phased out, so they devised a method to incentivize the use of renewable forms of energy in buildings. Their research resulted in the overhaul of the existing Passive House ‘Classic’ standard and the introduction of two new standards: ‘Passive House Plus’ and ‘Passive House Premium.’
Figure 2. Passive House counts generation losses, transmission losses and seasonal generation. (Original Illustration by author.)
Primary Energy Renewable ‘factors’ and how they work
All of the new Passive House standards now calculate Primary Energy using Primary Energy Renewable (PER) factors. These are designed to encourage the use of renewable energy sources and create either incentives, or disincentives, for installing various types of mechanical equipment in Passive House buildings. For example, in San Francisco, using a heat pump water heater to produce hot water will result in lower Primary Energy requirement numbers than using a gas tank water heater, making it easier to meet the certification target. (A heat pump water heater has a PER factor of 1.25 versus the 1.75 factor for a gas-fired water heater.)
PER factor calculations are based not only on fuel source, but also on site-specific load profiles calculated on an hourly basis. In this way, variations in regional utility grid source energy and typical time-of-day use profiles which impact the availability of renewable energy to meet a utility’s load for the local climate and region are factored into these calculations. As a result, the PER factors can vary from city to city in California. For example, the electricity PER factor for heating demand via heat pumps is 1.80 in Sacramento. This relatively high PER factor incentivizes reducing heating demand in winter, when renewable energy supplies are low. In San Diego the comparable PER factor is set at 1.30, where the climate is milder and cooling is typically a greater peak load issue. (See Figure 5 in Appendix)
Crediting renewable energy equitably
Conventionally, calculations of net zero depend on the difference between a building’s annual energy demand and annual on-site renewable energy production. These calculations penalize tall buildings with small roof areas, buildings with no solar access, and buildings that opt to use their roof area for green space or as active living spaces. PHI took a major deviation from such traditional methods for crediting renewable energy supply to buildings, recognizing that all sites are not created equal in this regard. PHI’s approach uses the following principles:
- Renewable offsets are calculated as a function of Projected Building Footprint (PBF) rather than total floor area. PBF is more proportional to available roof area than total floor area, which means multi-story buildings may achieve the Plus and Premium standards.
- Buildings with no solar access on site may purchase off-site renewable energy facilities to achieve Plus or Premium certification.
PH ‘Classic’ buildings with no on-site or off-site renewable energy supply are still optimized for efficiency first and a future grid supply of all renewable energy.
Figure 3. Tall and shaded buildings are not penalized by the PER calculation. (Original illustration by author.)
Biofuels, microgrids and battery storage
While biofuels are considered a renewable energy source, they carry a penalty for replacing food production. Their burning also generates particulate matter that is both unhealthy and emits carbon. For these reasons, the use of biofuels is allowed, but has been capped to limit its use.
The most intriguing areas of innovation with regards to manifesting the 100% renewable energy future currently look to be in developing our capacity to store renewable energy. We’re excited by the contributions being made right here in California to develop technologies that are contributing to our new energy future. Existing storage capacity from hydroelectric schemes is now being joined by a growing array of affordable short- and long-term battery storage options. Converting renewable energy into methane gas is another rapidly developing technology that could increase the viability of renewable energy by allowing us to store it for longer.
Remarkably, these options are all currently supported by the Primary Energy Renewable calculations embedded in the Passive House Classic, Plus and Premium standards. Indeed, the ‘Classic’ standard at the heart of all of them remains the foundation that most equitably supports an all-renewable energy future. The Classic standard ensures that these buildings are optimized to become batteries themselves: they’ve been proven to retain an unprecedented level of thermal comfort while eliminating peak loads. This optimization ensures that even without the addition of ‘active’ power, their passive capacity is what is literally doing the heavy lifting. These buildings enable occupants to survive in adequate comfort for very lengthy periods of time without any active energy inputs. This quality offers economic benefits to both the utilities and microgrid designs of renewable energy storage systems that extend well beyond comfort. Just imagine what we could do with renewable energy if we didn’t need so much of it to simply operate buildings. The possibilities are boundless.
This article was first published in August 2016 by Low Carbon Productions in the print copy of ‘Passive House Buildings: California’s Energy Future,’ produced in collaboration with Passive House California. Additional articles and California project examples may be viewed in the free e-book here.
Figure 4. PER demand and generation results table showing Certification Classifications (Taken from the PHPPv.9 – Copyright Passive House Institute)
Figure 5. PER factors for California’s largest cities sourced from PHPP v.9
Figure 6. Electricity use allocation showing direct consumption, storage and conversion potentials. (Copyright – Passive House Institute)
There’s no doubt that building to Passive House standards results in energy consumption that’s about 70 to 80 percent less than what you’d expect from a traditionally built home (or school, or office building, or factory…you get the picture). That’s due in part to the fact that the home is air tight, super-insulated and uses a heat recovery ventilation system that exhausts air (and moisture) and replaces it with fresh filtered air. It’s warmed primarily by passive solar and internal heat gains from occupants, cooking, bathing and electrical equipment and kept cool in summer through shading, window orientation and ventilation.
And yes, you can open the windows and doors. Thanks to the filtering system, it doesn’t matter if the doors and windows are open or closed. And no, you don’t have to live in a windowless box. Whatever style you wish, it’s possible with Passive House.
We recently interviewed the owners of Central California’s first certified Passive House that we finished in November 2012. The dramatic energy and water savings were givens. It was the bonus benefits that broadened the smile on our collective faces.
For starters, all year round every room is kept at a consistent temperature—no dips or spikes to get in the way of comfort. Evidence that the filtered air is pristine shows up in interesting ways. They’ve lived in the home four years and haven’t had to dust once…not a single time. There are no bugs on windows sills or in corners, no spider webs, no ants, none. Both occupants use allergy meds when they’re away from the home, but when they’re in their certified Passive House they retire the sprays and tablets after just a few hours. While the outside of the windows are washed periodically, the inside of the panes were washed only once. And according to the window washer, that wasn’t necessary.
And it’s quiet. There’s no whoosh of air from an HVAC system, noisy pipes or other sounds that seem to be present in the average house. Quiet is a secondary benefit of the excellent insulation in walls, ceiling and floors.
So when you add it all up, Passive is Aggressive as we like to say. After building this way, I know it’s simply the right way to build, whether or not we are pursuing Passive House certification. It’s better for the planet, better for the people who live in the home, and it makes me feel better knowing we’re building excellent quality homes.
While I’ll spare you the copious details, it’s important to understand state mandated energy reduction standards and how they impact upcoming changes in the building code. There are changes looming that significantly impact new residential construction as well as extensive remodels. Rules addressing commercial structures are not far behind, followed by requirements for existing structures.
Starting back in 1974, the State of California began implementing energy reduction standards. And the results have been dramatic. From the mid-1970s to 2005, ratepayers saved more than $65 billion, Californians paid 20% less on residential electricity bills than the average U.S. household, and we avoided the need to build nearly 30 large (500 MW) power plants. Additional standards came about as a result of The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, Assembly Bill (AB) 32, a California law that takes on global warming with a comprehensive program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from all sources throughout the state.
Here’s the scoop:
- New residential construction (which includes extensive remodels) has to be zero net energy by 2020. Zero net energy essentially means that the total amount of energy a building uses in a year is offset by renewable energy created on site. The most common source of onsite renewable energy is solar power.
- New commercial construction has to be zero net energy by 2030.
- By 2030, 50% of existing buildings must be equivalent to zero net energy buildings by achieving deep energy reductions with remaining power needs met by renewable resources, onsite or otherwise.
This is a good time for anyone thinking of building a new home or doing an extensive remodel to not only adhere to existing codes, but anticipate and incorporate strategies designed to meet the end goal of reducing carbon emissions. To meet the mandates we have to reduce the energy demands of buildings as much as possible, as fast as possible. Since the nearest mandate of 2020 affects new residential construction, let’s look at the building code changes that are now being enforced with greater consistency.
About every three years, building codes are updated. The 2013 building code cycle requirements to help us meet the 2020 deadline for carbon reduction are now being more aggressively enforced. Here are some highlights:
- QII (quality insulation installation) is now being enforced. Only when insulation is installed properly can it be effective in reducing air leaks and consequent energy waste. Because it’s often installed poorly, the R values of insulation have been increased: ceilings go from R19 to R30; walls remain at R13 with 2 x 4 openings and go up to R19 for 2 x 6 openings; floors go from R13 to R19. The R value is its thermal resistance and the higher the R value the more effective the insulation. The code also requires that the headers above windows and doors be insulated. We think the best answer is to make sure the insulation is installed properly and that the home is air tight.
- Code now basically says that you can’t use an open fireplace. The alternatives include a fireplace insert with a glass cover and pipe within a pipe system. One layer of the pipe draws air in while the other exhausts.
- Ducting for HVAC systems must be inspected and sealed to eliminate leaks. A lot of energy is wasted when conditioned air leaks from duct work. Ensuring that there are no leaks is one course of action. Using a ductless system, such as mini-split heat pumps, is an alternative we often use. Radiant heat in flooring is another.
- Because most new homes are air sealed, it’s mandatory in all new construction to have some kind of ventilation. We use HRV – heat recovery ventilation. While it’s acceptable code-wise to use high-grade bathroom fans to keep air moving throughout the house, they don’t do as good of a job of filtering out moisture. They also don’t draw in fresh filtered air, a major benefit of an HRV.
- A great deal of energy used to condition the space is lost through single pane windows. New energy efficient windows are required in all new construction.
- All new construction must be “solar ready.” That doesn’t mean that solar power has to be installed—but that will likely be required in another code cycle or two. For now it means that there has to be a place on a roof facing the sun without over-hanging trees and a pathway for the wires, essentially making the home ready for effective solar power to be installed.
- The issue of air conditioning is rising to the top. People building in warmer areas like the Carmel Valley and the Preserve for example, want air conditioning. You have to be able to move air easily through a duct system for air condition per the new code. If a ducted system is going to be used, it has to be designed into the home before it’s built. Mini-split heat pumps, that don’t require ducting, can be used for heating and cooling.
The code is just one of the levers we have to use to nudge people in the right direction. Another is the rising cost of energy. An air tight, well-insulated, energy efficient home is certainly a start, but how occupants consume energy in their home also matters. Check out the energy and money saving tips at www.pge.com and stay tuned for more information from CB&D.
For more than two decades, I’ve been on quest to practice my profession in a way that aligns with my values and sense of responsibility to clients and the health of the environment. While the topic of carbon emissions—aka greenhouse gasses (GHG) or carbon footprint—has been circulating for a long time, it wasn’t until more recently that it became the focus of energy policymakers at the local, state, national and global level.
Passive House—a movement that started in ‘91 with a pilot project in Darmstadt, Germany, first hitting our shores in the early 2000s—has risen to the top as an effective and proven tool to drive down carbon emissions. This system of standards applies to buildings of all types and in every imaginable climate. With little or no added expense, PH strategies yield substantial reductions (we’re talking about 80% in the two PH-certified homes I’ve built so far) in energy usage while providing outstanding comfort, safety and health for occupants.
In June, I attended the North American Passive House Network conference in New York City where people from around the globe gathered to learn, share and pump up the urgency for change at their local and state levels. Cities, counties and states are mandated to reduce overall carbon emissions by dates as early as 2020. This is our new reality. Passive House offers a clear and reliable road map to meeting and exceeding the mandates. Its proven strategies are being woven into climate action plans around the country, making significant progress in limiting GHG from the built environment.
Here are 10 key things I took away from the conference, reinforcing my confidence in the power of Passive House:
- Passive House can reduce the energy demand of buildings by around 80%. We’re talking new construction, remodels and retrofits of every type of building whether residential, commercial, industrial or institutional.
- A quick look at these facts emphasizes the building industry’s vital role in addressing climate change: In 2010, the building sector accounted for 32% of global energy use; 25% of energy related CO2 emissions; 51% of global electricity consumption…And in the U.S. that last figure was 70%! Building-related emissions more than doubled since 1970 and are expected to double/triple again by mid-century.
- On top of dramatically reducing energy demand, PH principles such as air sealing, thorough insulation and innovative mechanical systems, yield much improved indoor air quality, quiet and durability and significantly lower carbon emissions.
- Cities and states around the country are not only incorporating PH standards into policies as a way to meet aggressive energy reduction (and as a result, carbon footprint) mandates, they are leading by example. A number of cities represented at the conference, including Vancouver and New York, are requiring that city-owned capital projects be designed to use at least 50% less energy than current standards dictate. And it wasn’t just the “plans” that were outlined at the conference, the “results” of completed projects and initiatives provided solid proof that these strategies work.
- Innovations in technologies, materials and services are increasingly prolific, making PH more feasible, affordable and relevant than ever before.
- Passive House can work anywhere, in any type of climate. In fact, it lets occupants ride out extreme weather events and power outages in relative comfort.
- PH yields long thermal constants, requiring very little heating and cooling. Any needed space conditioning can be scheduled for non-peak times when the supply of renewable energy like solar is readily available.
- In 2011, per the U.S. Dept. of Energy, 88% of the electricity consumed in this country was provided by nonrenewable sources. And this doesn’t include fuels like oil and natural gas consumed in large quantities at the individual building level.
- By significantly reducing the energy demand of buildings, PH can also help ease the transition to a grid supply based on renewable energy.
- While it’s not a PH strategy, addressing the amount of energy related to water usage is a sound building science strategy. Almost 20% of California’s energy use is related to water—the carbon footprint includes the energy to collect, treat and deliver it to buildings, heat it and treat it after use. Building science strategies can be used to reduce the amount of energy required to heat water as well as the amount of water wasted while it’s heating up. Think structured plumbing, gray water heat recovery and recycling technologies like the Nexus eWater system, and reusing gray water and rainwater for exterior landscape irrigation.
When 175 countries signed the Paris Climate Accord in April this year, it was a welcome harbinger of the need to halt climate change by deeply cutting carbon emissions. As UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon put it, “We are in a race against time. The era of consumption without consequences is over.” It’s exciting to see concepts like Passive House and Net Zero Energy (energy demand is reduced so significantly with PH that the minimal power needs can be met with PV panels) taking hold. Through our cities’ and counties’ climate action plans, we have the opportunity to turn the tide of climate change and restore the health of our planet.
If you’d like to know about Passive House, send me an email at email@example.com.
The state of water in the State of CA
Posted June 28, 2016 by Rob Nicely
So California finally got ample rain and snow during the 15/16 season. We also got used to using a lot less water, especially for washing cars and watering lawns. It’s actually nice to see the creativity at play as we move away from the traditional green lawns to use of drought tolerant plants or zero-water materials. We’ve gotten used to shorter showers, not letting the water zip down the drain as we brush our teeth, saving up for fuller loads in the dish- and clothes-washers, along with other conservation measures. It wasn’t so bad now was it? Why not consider this our new reality rather than celebrating a decent wet season by lapsing into old water wasting habits? We did it so why not continue and get even more creative? After all, we are certainly not out of the drought woods…who knows how much of that water will disappear with the summer heat, or if we’ll see rain again this winter? The Monterey Peninsula Water Management District is in a little different position since our resources of fresh water are especially limited. Here, continued conservation and restrictions are in place. So, put the rainy season to good use—read, study up, surf the Net, take a class through the local water resources agency—and learn more about the many ways to use water more wisely. And remember, when you conserve water, the lower water bills will put a little more green in your piggy bank. Here are a few tips to keep in mind:
Manage your liquid assets inside and out
- Little drops can lead to big leaks in your wallet. Check faucets, showerheads and pipes for drips—typical repairs are simple and low cost.
- Keep a pitcher of water in the fridge to avoid wasting water to make it cold.
- Explore the feasibility of an on-demand or recirculation system for your home. A lot of water goes down the drain while it’s heating up.
- It’s been said before, but it still makes sense. Turn off the water while doing things like brushing your teeth. Stop the flow until you need it.
- Attach an adjustable spray head to your garden hose, and make sure it doesn’t drip or leak around the edges.
- Turn off the water just before you’re finished and use what’s left in the hose so it’s not lost a drop at a time.
- Opt for drought tolerant plantings for a beautiful, budget-loving landscape.
- Consider a ‘smart’ irrigation system. It detects moisture in the soil and turns on the water only when your veggies and flowers are thirsty.
- Explore a water catchment system for use in hydrating plants and gardens, or washing the car. Whether you opt for a simple barrel to collect rainwater or a sophisticated system that captures the flow from the shower and washing machine, you’ll have ‘recycled’ this liquid asset.
Thirsting for information? Send me an email. firstname.lastname@example.org.
Building in a way that not only creates a better quality, much more energy efficient and comfortable home, but also reduces our overall negative impact on the environment, just makes sense to us. And because we have the know-how, resources, materials, technologies…and growing body of experience, there’s just no good reason not to. Whether or not we’re following a specific set of guidelines such as Passive House, we always build in a way that reduces waste in materials, resources, energy and water. We use reclaimed or recycled materials when possible, utilize strategies like advanced framing and window placement for passive light and temperature control, choose finishes with very low or no VOCs, and insulate thoroughly. It’s a matter of thinking through the project, understanding the owners’ vision, and moving forward in a way that improves the home’s performance. While we have many projects that meet the standards of Passive House, Zero Net Energy, Living Building Challenge, LEED, and other green building programs, we don’t see a reason not to build responsibly whether or not we’re pursuing a certification. It’s just the right thing to do. And a better way to build—for the homeowner, and the planet. If you’d like more info on our standard building practices or those that go even further down the path of quality and sustainability, send me an email. email@example.com
Our rationale of following the path of Passive House, LEED, Zero Net Energy, Living Building Challenge or other specific set of guidelines is not to achieve a certification to have in our portfolio. These programs provide standards that achieve a better quality home with high energy efficiency, interior spaces that are comfortable, have healthy air quality and are quiet, yield a durable home that has a lower carbon footprint and is kinder to the planet, along with a clear way to get there. They offer our clients, and us, a way to clarify preferences, priorities and possibilities. As an advocate of building in a sustainable way, we’re always on the lookout for techniques, technologies and materials that help us do a better job. And do it with little or no added cost over the way we would build or remodel any custom home. The more homes that are built in an environmentally sound fashion, the greater the demand for related materials and systems. That’s especially important on a local level. Think about the impact of transporting earth friendly materials across the country versus having them available through local suppliers. We’ve already had a breakthrough in that regard with Roxul rockwool that we used in a Carmel project. Hayward, based in Monterey, agreed to purchase a larger quantity, sell us the portion we needed and stock the rest for our future use and, hopefully, for other builders in the area. It’s this kind of progress that will propel the movement of true sustainable building from a niche specialty to the way it’s always done. It’s a better way to build a higher quality home. Want to know more. Send me an email. firstname.lastname@example.org
Water, water everywhere…and not a drop to waste.
Posted March 4, 2016 by Rob Nicely
Tis the rainy season and for the first year in several, we’re actually getting some rain. Time to replant the lawn, take those extra-long showers and run the dishwasher to clean a single plate. Hardly! These are extravagant (albeit a little exaggerated) luxuries that should never again become de rigueur. Let’s use this as an opportunity to create real change around water conservation. Even if—and it’s a BIG if—our area’s rainfall returns to normal levels over the next couple of years and our reservoirs are replenished, we can’t fool ourselves into thinking drought conditions won’t return. Fortunately, we’ve learned lessons—some the hard way—on how we can use less water especially for the non-necessities like the sprawling lawns of yesteryear. The market has produced water-saving toilets, showers, faucets and irrigation systems. And new technologies, like those that treat graywater for use in flushing toilets, are continuing to emerge. It’s no time to rest on our soggy laurels. It’s time to remain vigilant, and creative, about water conservation whether building or remodeling, and in daily life. So, put the rainy season to good use—read, study up, surf the Net, take a class through the local water resources agency—to learn more about the many ways to use water more wisely. And remember, when you conserve water, the lower water bills will put a little more green in your piggy bank. Thirsting for information? Send me an email. email@example.com.
Anyone who has read a blog, sat in on one of my presentations or been a client of Carmel Building & Design knows that I’m passionate about sustainable building. The passion stems from a desire to take what I’ve learned about human impact on the environment over the past 25 years and apply it to my chosen profession. But, it’s not just a way to satisfy my need to address the larger issues that come with being environmentally mindful, it’s also a way to meet the needs of homeowners—like the need for healthier indoor air quality, quiet, durability, and energy and water conservation. And in the end, building in a way that’s better for the home’s occupants is also better for the planet.
These are not conclusions or practices that I’ve come to easily, nor alone. There are many forward thinkers who have contributed to the wealth of knowledge that’s available today. Often it’s a matter of trying things, taking steps then looking back to see if something can be improved to achieve an even better result. I admit that looking at the BIG picture can be overwhelming and trying to address all the problems out there can quickly stamp out the flame of activism. It’s important to start small, and start smart. Notice that START is the operative word.
Another realization I’ve come to is that it’s crucial to celebrate and take pride in every achievement regardless of scope or size. Sometimes I expend too much effort thinking about what I haven’t yet done versus what I’ve been able to accomplish. Every step we take in the right direction is reason for joy…nothing motivates most of us like the sense of having done something right, something good.
The reasons we decide to adopt a more planet friendly, sustainable lifestyle, don’t matter as much as the decision itself. One person might want healthier indoor air quality because there’s asthma or allergies in the family. Another might be looking to build or remodel a home that is more durable and has a better resale value. Another could be most concerned with lowering their carbon footprint, while yet another might focus more on energy and water conservation and reducing related costs. Whatever brings you to the table, be proud that you’re taking a seat, and a stand.
The building industry has a tremendous impact on reducing harmful carbon emissions through the homes, buildings and communities we design and build. At the November 13, Building Carbon Zero California conference in Palo Alto, keynote speaker Dr. Diana Ürge-Vorsatz spoke to the impact of the building industry on reducing the carbon emissions that fuel climate change. I’ll throw out a few facts that drive the point home:
- In 2010, the building sector accounted for 32% of global energy use; 25% of energy related CO2 emissions; 51% of global electricity consumption…And in the U.S. that last figure was 70%!
- Building-related emissions more than doubled since 1970; expected to double/triple again by mid-century.
- It’s a fallacy that the power plants, not the buildings, are creating the problem. Buildings create demand for the energy that power plants produce. Our buildings need cooling and heating, lighting, etc. most coming from electricity. Globally, one-fifth of total energy used in buildings is heating/cooling. (In my experience, it’s higher in the U.S.)
- The building industry plays a key role in bringing this total energy usage down.
- Good design in residential building and retrofits can reduce heating/cooling energy use by 1/3 by mid-century, assuming that building floor area will at least double during same period, without sacrificing comfort.
- Why retrofit or build to achieve only a 30-40% increase in efficiency, when we can employ available standards like Passive House and others and achieve a 90% increase in efficiency?
- Passive House and other high-performance building standards need to become part of the building code, moving high-performance from a niche to a mass market.
- Very high performance buildings can save as much as 60% of HVAC-related energy globally by 2050.
To see her presentation, visit www.co2zeroca.org, click on link under Highlights and go to Keynote presentation. The entire presentation on climate change is fascinating, but she gets to the heart of the building industry’s impact around 1:01 if you want to focus on that.
Over the next few months, I’ll be focusing blogs on positive outcomes, things that are being done to improve our state of living and nurture the health of the planet. Stay tuned. And feel free to send your questions, comments and suggestions to firstname.lastname@example.org.
It’s common knowledge that a good chunk of our energy costs go into heating and cooling our homes. And after we’ve conditioned the air to be at just the right temperature throughout the house, it all too often leaks out through seams, cracks and even the tiniest holes. This is not only a waste of energy, but dollars. In fact, leaks account for the biggest losses in both categories.
We’ve long used insulation as a way to increase energy efficiency, but if air is leaking in and out, even the best insulation simply can’t do its job. That’s where air sealing comes into play. While it’s possible, and advisable, to air seal an existing structure, this blog focuses on creating an air tight seal during the construction process. We’ve been doing it for a while now and are always discovering new processes, techniques and materials. For me, that type of “problem solving” is fun. I can get creative.
The first step in air sealing a home is to develop a strategy to seal what is basically a six-sided box, and there are tons of variables to consider. I start by looking at a cross-section of the plans and literally draw a red line where I think I can create an interrupted air tight boundary. It’s important to recognize and address the most challenging spots or transitions. These occur where the walls meet the floor, between the floor and underneath the house and where the walls join the roof at the eaves.
Once we’ve achieved our air tight boundary, we need to look at what are generally known as penetrations. These occur wherever there’s an opening, whether it’s for windows and doors, wiring, plumbing, cans for recessed lighting, electrical outlets and nail holes…anything that goes through the assemblies. We use a variety of materials including panels, tapes and membranes and liquid applied products, carefully sealing up the structure as we go along during the construction process. It’s much harder and much less cost effective to go back and try to plug leaks after the finishes are applied. Once the house is done, we use a number of tests to make sure we’ve caught everything. In the past few homes we’ve built, we passed the air leak tests on the first try. These tests generally involve pressurizing the house, then using an infrared camera and a smoke pencil to catch even the smallest leaks, especially those that can’t be detected by just feeling or looking for them.
The main types of sealing products and systems we currently use include Zip Wall, SIGA tapes and membranes and Prosoco liquid applied materials. Each one has its own purpose and we use all three in a typical project. Zip Wall, which comes with its own proprietary tape, is not only an air barrier on the home’s exterior, it is also a moisture barrier. SIGA tapes and membranes are used to seal seams, transition points and penetrations. Prosoco is a good choice for sealing around windows and other openings. It’s easily applied by brushing it on like paint or from a caulking gun and flattened out with a putty knife.
Air tight homes require mechanical ventilation—like the Zehnder Heat Recovery Ventilation unit we highlighted in our last blog and video—to ensure a supply of filtered, temperature controlled air. We also take care to avoid use of products that contain toxins known as VOCs found in conventional paints, glues, carpets and other finishes. Fortunately, with current and upcoming changes in the building code, more materials and systems are coming on the market all the time.
Nothing gobbles up energy—and eats away at a homeowner’s budget—like heating and cooling the home’s interior. Considering the number of points in a traditionally-built home where air—along with the money you’ve spent to warm it up—leaks in and out, dad’s classic question of, “Are you trying to heat the outdoors?” comes to mind.
We’ll go into more detail about air sealing in another blog, but suffice it to say that this strategy has led to the need for innovative mechanical ventilation systems. In the past, mechanical ventilation wasn’t needed because homes were so leaky, but now that we’re building tighter structures, the building code requires it. In the last few homes we’ve built, we’ve chosen a heat recovery ventilation system (HRV). A HRV not only saves energy by reducing the amount of treated air that is wasted, it also improves indoor air quality.
The most important thing to understand about a heat recovery ventilation system is that it brings in fresh air and exhausts stale air, but it doesn’t let all of the heat in the outgoing air escape while it’s at it. A HRV, like the Zehnder Comfosystems unit that we’ve used in a number of homes, works like a radiator to pass most of the heat in the outgoing air to the incoming air rather than wasting the energy you’ve already used in heating it. This particular HRV unit is about 85 percent efficient. Simply put, that means that if the air going out of the house is 70 degrees and the air outside that’s coming in is 40 degrees, the HRV warms the air to about 65 degrees before it lets it into the house.
The incoming air passes through the HRV and goes on to a manifold. At the manifold, the air goes from a single big pipe to many smaller pipes, which in turn service all of the rooms that receive ventilated air. Usually this includes the main rooms like the living areas and bedrooms. Some rooms have return air vents. These are typically “wet” rooms like the bathrooms, laundry and kitchen from which stale, wet air is collected to be routed out of the house. The system also collects and exhausts excess moisture that might otherwise lead to mold and mildew.
This leads me to another benefit of a HRV—improved indoor air quality. By eliminating air leaks in the home and getting your fresh air from the ventilation system, you are ensuring that the indoor air you breathe is clean and healthy. As I said before, in an older house air is leaking in wherever it can find a way. A common scenario is that warm air, because it rises, will find a way to leak out up high, often through cracks between the wall and roof framing or through the cans around recessed lighting. The replacement air comes in from down low through leaks in the floor or bottom of the walls. This means that often the air you are breathing is coming from your crawlspace, most likely tainted with dust, mold spores, even the residue of pest sprays. By contrast, when you have a tightly sealed house and a HRV, the air you are breathing is coming from a known source and through a fine filter. You can choose filters based on your specific health needs and preferences.
A HRV ensures energy efficiency and a comfortable, healthy indoor environment in an air tight home.
Check out the accompanying video on heating and cooling.
Back in the ‘70s, California’s Title 24 revised the state’s building code to include limits for energy usage in built environments. The go-to solution for stemming the amount of energy required for heating and cooling quickly became insulation. For decades, the most frequently used type of insulation was fiberglass batt, laid between framing in walls and ceilings. To work effectively, insulation has to completely stop the movement of air. The fiberglass itself is not the insulation—it’s the material’s ability to trap air—known in the trades as the “dead air space strategy.” The primary challenges have been installing it in a way that completely fills all the cavities, and protecting the installers from skin rashes and breathing the harmful particles that escape during the process.
As an alternative, many of us turned to blown-in foam as insulation because it’s much better at perfectly filling the cavity. While foam does an incredible job of insulating and creating a thermal boundary, it also comes with drawbacks. The accelerant can be harmful to installers and special protective gear is required. It also produces greenhouse gasses that lead to depletion of the ozone layer.
Today, insulating is a “no brainer” in the building process. And we’re diverting that extra brain power into developing materials and strategies that are safer for people and the environment, yet significantly more effective. For insulation in our Carmel Point project, following protocols of the Living Building Challenge, we’re using two innovative products—blown-in cellulose and rock wool. Cellulose, made of at least 80% post-consumer paper waste, is blown into all the spaces between framing on interior walls and ceilings. It doesn’t require the harmful accelerants of blown-in foam. Rock wool, a by-product of steel smelting, is formed into rigid boards for insulation over exterior framing. On top of being a super-insulator, rock wool also repels water that can cause damage to the structure and negatively impact interior air quality, over time.
Products like these, and those to come in the future, turn waste into viable materials that keep us on the path of responsible, sustainable building.
Check out the accompanying video on insulation.
Studies show that the average home wastes more than 3,650 gallons a year waiting for the hot water to make it to the faucet. And about 15% of the energy used in conventional hot water delivery systems is wasted.1 That’s an unnecessary burden on your energy budget as well as on our area’s limited water supply and other natural resources.
In the Carmel Point home we’re building, following the Living Building Challenge, one of the solutions we’re using is a demand-controlled circulation system with what the industry calls “structured plumbing.” We like to call it “strategic plumbing.” Here are a few details of our strategic plumbing system:
- One main ¾-inch PEX recirculation loop with short “twigs” rather than “branches” to each faucet
- To maximize flow and minimize mixing of hot and cold water, this line is all sweeps and the only fittings are ¾ x ½-inch tees
- Each tee supplies a fixture with hot water and each fixture has its own ½-inch supply line. The bathtub and clothes washer share a ½-inch line
- All but one of the supply lines are less than 8-feet long containing about 1 cup of water
- When a demand button is pushed or a motion sensor is triggered, the pump sends hot water through the recirculation loop at 4 to 6 GPM and shuts off when the hot water arrives at the last fixture in the loop, taking less than 2 minutes
- Because of well-insulated pipes, the water in the loop remains above 105° for 30 to 40 minutes
- A signal from another demand button or sensor will not trigger the pump until the water temperature falls below 105°
- Wired demand buttons can be located at the entrance to the house, bedroom night stands and the kitchen; motion sensors may work best in the bathrooms, laundry and other locations to suit the owners’ patterns of use
- There is nothing in this system that is outside the existing plumbing code
In every house we build, we look for ways to increase energy efficiency and reduce related waste and costs. Along with the Nexus system, this advanced hot water delivery system dramatically reduces both the energy used to heat the water and the amount of water wasted.
Check out the accompanying video on structured plumbing.
In every house we build, we look for ways to increase energy efficiency and reduce related waste and costs. In the Carmel Point home we’re building, following the Living Building Challenge, some solutions we’re using include an awesome water-to-water heat pump, demand-controlled circulation system and what the industry calls “structured plumbing.” Together, these systems dramatically reduce both the energy used to heat the water and the amount of water wasted.
Let’s talk first about the water heating system that’s a lot more than a heat pump. It’s called the Nexus Heat Recovery System. Used in Australia, Nexus was introduced in the U.S. a couple years back. It’s in a model home near Sacramento, but this is the first complete system installed in a residence in the U.S. We are excited about proving that such a “totally cool” system can work. Here are the highlights of this extraordinary and revolutionary system:
- The system includes the NEXheater energy recycling water-to-water heat pump, the eWater Collector to collect grey water, NEXtreater grey water treatment system and the NEXservoir treated water storage tank. The grey water treatment system is expected to complete the testing process in December and be certified as a NSF 350 “onsite treatment system for non-potable grey water.” This certification is recognized by the County of Monterey Environmental Health Department.
- The house was plumbed for separate grey water and black water drain systems, both terminating in the mechanical room. Grey water from the laundry, bathtub, showers and bathroom sinks will drain into the collection tank. The water heater will remove the heat from the grey water, then send the grey water to the treatment system. The treated water will be stored in a tank for exterior landscaping or non-potable use in toilets.
o When you take a shower or wash clothes the warm water goes down the drain
o The warm water is collected in the 75-gallon capacity grey water collector
o Because hot water from the water heater tank was used, it starts the heat pump process between the collector and the heater, pulling the heat back out of the warm grey water
o When that “batch” of warm grey water has brought the water heater temperature back up to 120° the grey water is sent to the treatment unit
o That batch of grey water is treated and sent to the treated water reservoir
o The treated water may be used to flush toilets or irrigate landscaping
o The system has the capacity to treat 200 gallons of grey water per day
o When you stop using the system at night, the cycle is completed leaving the water heater hot, the collector empty and the treated water waiting in the tank
o The cycle starts all over again the next time you use hot water
Check out the accompanying video on Nexus eWater.
Taking on the Living Building Challenge
Posted by Rob Nicely, Carmel Building & Design
We have to be the luckiest design/build firm ever. We have clients who not only want to incorporate sustainable building practices into their home, but they fully embrace the latest and highest standards. We’re currently working with a couple on a complete remodel of their Carmel Point home, applying the principles of Living Building Challenge (LBC) and aiming for LBC net zero energy certification.
LBC is not just a new way of building. It’s a new way of thinking and living that carefully considers and respects our finite natural resources and precious environment. It takes Passive House, LEED, Net Zero Energy and all other sustainable and green design and building practices into a completely different dimension. It’s an ideal, yet it has practical applications that we’re employing today. To say that we are learning a lot and excited about the opportunity to test new technologies, products and approaches would be an understatement.
On top of significantly reducing energy consumption and producing the remaining energy needed to run the house onsite, meeting the LBC challenge includes avoiding use of toxic materials included on their “Red List.” For things that we routinely use in construction—PVC, certain insulation materials, paints and finishes—we got creative and found viable alternatives.
This 2,000-square-foot ocean-side home will feature innovations like interior blown-in cellulose and exterior Rock Wool insulation—made from post-consumer newspapers and a by-product of steel smelting, respectively; finishes and fixtures from Green Goods—a company specializing in environmentally sound, non-toxic paints, cabinets, tiles and more. We’re also installing a breakthrough water heating system—the Nexus eWater system. It’s an energy recycling water heater that uses waste heat in the drain water from showers and laundry to heat water. After the system extracts the heat from grey water, it treats and stores water for use in the garden as well as interior non-potable functions like flushing toilets. An approach called “structured plumbing” will enable us to deliver hot water to any faucet in 3 to 5 seconds, wasting only about 1 cup of water.
We are well into this project and thought you’d enjoy following along. We’re also doing a series of short videos that we’ll be posting on You Tube that showcase different, unique processes and technologies we’re using for this home. We’ll post a link on our site and Facebook as soon as each one is ready for prime time.
A couple quotes come to mind when I think about green building:
“Sustainable development involves meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” (Earth Summit, Rio De Janeiro, 1992)
“By making smarter choices about how you build and the products you use, you can significantly contribute to the health, wealth and well-being of yourself, your family, your community, and the world.”
As green building continues to become more mainstream, we are deluged with definitions of “green.” Be it through the media, trade publications or discussions with friends, it’s likely that the info is confusing or contradictory.
With this in mind, let’s review the basic terms. The notion of green building (or the green economy, or the green anything) is based on the concept of sustainability. A sustainable system is one that can go on forever, where the inputs are renewable and their acquisition doesn’t degrade the related environment.
The movement toward green products and methods reflects a widespread recognition that we can’t go on doing things the way we—as a society—have done in the past. With more than seven billion people on Earth, and our radically increased ability to process and consume resources, it’s due time that we rethink and retool.
Green building is our industry’s response to finding ourselves at this peculiar point in human history. To help you sort out whether a proposed practice or product is legitimate vs. “green washing,” here is a short list of things to consider when pondering “green-ness”:
- Energy and Atmosphere—How much energy went into the production and shipping of the product? Did the manufacturer use renewable energy sources and work diligently to reduce energy usage? Was the product shipped from far away (using more energy) or was it made close to where you’ll use it? If it is an electronic or other energy-dependent device, how much will it use during its lifetime? Is it efficient relative to alternatives? These questions impact the “carbon footprint” of that item and, hopefully, your decision to purchase it. The over-arching idea is to choose ways of fulfilling your needs that use as little fossil fuel and other non-renewable resources as possible.
- Materials and Resources—When it comes to materials and resources, the idea is to limit the use of non-renewable materials, those with a large carbon footprint and anything that’s extracted in a way that does damage to natural systems. As an example from our industry, we try to incorporate as much engineered lumber as possible. This lumber can be made with smaller, less mature trees that are more abundant and easier to replace than mature trees. Products that incorporate recycled content do less damage to the environment. Another important consideration is product disposal. Can it be recycled or easily re-enter the system after its use? Or, does it contain toxins that make it difficult or impossible to re-introduce into the eco-system? An example from the past that we continue to deal with today (and will forever) are materials that contain asbestos and lead. When these materials were first introduced, we didn’t know (or maybe care) about the harm they would cause. Today, disposing of these materials is incredibly complicated. We have to hire someone to assess the level of hazard, then another person who is certified to take and dispose of it as safely as possible. Carpet is a more contemporary example. Elements of carpeting, like the glue, are toxic and some materials don’t break down. Typically, the entire carpet is thrown out. Because nylon doesn’t degrade and other components are toxic, it can’t be reused as a consumer product and doesn’t easily re-enter the eco-system. And this leads to my next point…
- Toxins and Indoor Air Quality—In construction, it has been common practice to use products containing toxins that “off-gas” into your home, potentially affecting your health. And after the useful life of the product, that toxicity will have to be dealt with as it returns to some other part of the environment.
- Water Conservation—I add this because, a) water is so precious in our region and its availability increasingly impacts our lives in many ways, and b) there is an important link between water conservation and energy conservation. It takes a lot of energy just to get the water to your home. And once it’s there, it takes even more to heat it and pump it to faucets. On top of using less water, it helps to properly insulate pipes and not to waste water that’s already been heated.
This is a lot to consider, but I hope it helps you sort out what “green” really means.
Growing for the future—the sustainably managed forest
Posted by Rob Nicely, Carmel Building & Design
It wasn’t until I visited the 94,000-acre Collins Almanor Forest near California’s Mount Lassen a few years back that I understood what “sustainably managed” means. For the Collins Pine company, it has been a way of doing business since they started timber operations in 1941 on land they began acquiring as far back as 1902.
From the get-go, they used a “sustained yield” management strategy, essentially meaning that harvesting is done in a way that doesn’t hamper the forest’s continued growth. To do this, they estimated how much timber was there when they started. Then they implemented a cutting strategy that allowed them to harvest trees without damaging the ecology of the area or diminishing the future potential yield of the forest. By 2009, after they had harvested about 1.5 billion board feet of lumber, they still had resources left to harvest for another 70 to 80 years. The company’s sustainable use of the land has earned it status as one of the premier Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) operations in the U.S.
FSC has risen from the alphabet soup of certifying bodies as the only one that represents real accountability in forestry practices—it tracks and certifies the product from the time it was a tree until it reaches the construction site, paper mill or other production site. All three Collins forests—Almanor, Pennsylvania and Lakeview, that together span 314,000 acres—have been independently certified by SCS global Services in accordance with FSC standards and policies.
Until I visited this forest, FSC was one of the abstract concepts that buzzed around in my head when thinking about “green building.” Jay Francis, forest manager for Collins Pine Company, took us to a sustainably harvested forest as well as one that was clear-cut (a common practice in conventional timber operations). We also visited a forest that was unmanaged or “wild.” Trust me, the unmanaged forest was nothing like those described by early settlers—open and park-like, with plenty of light filtering in and space to accommodate their wagons. Today, unmanaged forests are characterized by a buildup of dead limbs and leaves—increasing the danger of catastrophic fire—and a glut of undergrowth that chokes out sunlight and keeps grasses and other plants from thriving. Not to mention that this diminishes available food for herbivores who call the forest home.
One reason “unmanaged” doesn’t equal “natural” is that we’ve changed the relationship between the forest and fire. Before the West was populated, the forest would burn periodically due to spontaneous fires sparked by lightning or to Native Americans starting fires to maintain the health of the habitat. It’s also important to note that when fires burn periodically (every 15 years or so), the fuel load is controlled and fire doesn’t become the traumatic event that it is today.
This experience really opened my eyes. I never imagined the depth of knowledge and level of engagement with the forest required to produce the materials we need, while nurturing the health of the resource. Now, it seems like a no-brainer to choose FSC whenever possible for lumber, paper and other wood products, especially when much of it can be had at the same or close to the same price. For more info, check out www.fsc.org.
Every day should be Earth Day
Posted by Rob Nicely, Carmel Building & Design
Here are ten things we can all do to celebrate Earth Day, starting now and all year long.
1. Buy local—whenever possible, opt for items that are produced or grown near you. They require less transportation and the related impacts on the environment. www.seemonterey.com/food-wine/farmers-markets
2. Lose the leaks—check ductwork, windows, doors and indoor/outdoor plumbing for leaks. Small fixes can mean big savings in water and heating/cooling costs as well as make for a more comfortable and healthier indoor environment.
3. Think twice before you toss—ask yourself…Can I find a new use for it? Can I recycle it? Can I donate it? Can I compost it? When you answer “yes” and take action, you help reduce the vast amounts that go into landfills. www.mrwmd.org/programs-services
4. Get growing—whether in pots on a patio, balcony or porch or in a patch of land, use whatever space you have to grow your favorite herbs and veggies.
5. Make the switch—keep a supply of reusable bags handy for shopping. And don’t forget to take them into the store.
6. Take steps—benefit your health as well as the planet by walking or biking instead of driving when you can.
7. Ditch the disposables—Treat yourself to reusable mugs, glasses, water bottles and other containers to cut down on the amount of trash from single use items.
8. Green up—take a little time out of your busy schedule to explore websites (including ours) for ideas on greener living, and re-greening your home. www.carmelbuilding.com
9. Get involved—volunteer for a cleanup day. Pick up and dispose of trash when you see it rather than walking on by.
10. Save your energy—sign up for a home energy audit. You might be surprised at the money, and natural resources, you can save. You’ll get a list of strategies to choose from as your time and budget allow.
Indoor air quality
Posted by Rob Nicely, Carmel Building & Design
Long after the 2005 Hurricane Katrina disaster, there are still many lessons to be learned. More than 143,000 families were moved into trailers provided by FEMA, and many of them immediately fell ill. Investigators found that particleboard used in the cabinets and other interior finishes was off gassing so much formaldehyde that the interior air was toxic. Besides causing acute symptoms such as burning eyes, coughing, sore throat, and bloody noses, breathing formaldehyde raises the risk of cancer and chronic respiratory disease.
This is an extreme example of a phenomenon we must be concerned with any time we create interior living spaces. Many of the products manufactured for building applications contain formaldehyde and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that off-gas into the air. Along with mold—caused largely by use of poor construction methods—these chemicals contribute to unhealthy indoor living conditions and even result in acute or chronic health problems, especially for children, the elderly and people with compromised immune systems.
Luckily, there are many products and methods available for creating healthier homes. An alternative to urea-formaldehyde glue is being used in the manufacture of competitively priced plywood and particleboard. And there are many low- or no-VOC paints and finishes on the market. Formaldehyde-free insulation is also widely available. Construction methods that create a sound, moisture-free building envelope can eliminate most molds.
These examples are some of the reasons we’re so passionate about building in ways that benefit occupants as well as our planet. Our design principles and building practices always incorporate environmentally mindful features that improve indoor air quality, enhance value, reduce energy and maintenance costs and are easy on the planet—regardless of whether or not we’re going for a certification.
The evolution of insulation
Posted by Rob Nicely, Carmel Building & Design
Back in the ‘70s, California’s Title 24 added the use of energy in built environments to the building code. Insulation was deemed a primary way of reducing the amount of energy used for heating and cooling. While insulating has become a routine part of the building process, we are still working on the most effective and safe materials and installation strategies. Historically, fiberglass batt has been the most frequently used type of insulation, but with several drawbacks—it causes skin rash and itching and it is harmful to breathe the particles that escape during installation. And there is no “perfect” way to install it. To actually do what it’s supposed to do, insulation has to completely stop the movement of air…the fiberglass isn’t the real insulator, it’s the air trapped by it—known in the trades as the “dead air space strategy.” Today, many of us have turned to blown-in insulation using fiberglass or foam as an alternative strategy. While I’ve used foam over the past few years due to its ability to create a solid thermal boundary, I’ve not given up on finding healthier, even more effective options. There are new things on the market—like cellulose and rock wool. Made of at least 80% post-consumer paper waste, blown-in cellulose creates a good seal. Rock wool, a by-product of steel smelting operations, looks a lot like cellulose. The cool thing about rock wool is that it can also be used as rigid boards on the outside of framing. On top of being a super-insulator, it also repels water. And it’s a planet-friendly alternative to foam insulation. We’re using it on our Carmel Point project that’s aiming for certification by Living Building Challenge. Products like these, and those to come in the future, turn waste into viable materials that keep us on the path of responsible, sustainable building.
Be a part of the solution
Posted by Rob Nicely, Carmel Building & Design
When it comes to protecting our natural resources and natural wonders that attract tourists from around the world, pumping up the local economy and coming up with real solutions, people often ask, “How can I get involved?” One powerful way is through the Monterey County Business Council. MCBC is an alliance of businesspeople and professionals who work together on countywide issues involving the environment, economic vitality and quality of life. The work is broken down into “Competitive Clusters” or C2 for short. I’m proud to co-chair the Sustainable Building & Innovation C2 with Dan Fernandez. We meet the third Wednesday of each month at the Monterey College of Law, 3:30 to 5:00 to tackle some of the challenges facing our communities. There are several initiatives underway that address responsible disposal of construction materials, use of grey water, storm water management and more. It’s inspiring to see the growing interest in coming up with workable solutions. They’re out there. We just have to harness them and put them into action. Everyone is welcome to our meetings. It’s a great way to learn about all the exciting things going on behind the scenes in Monterey County, and how you can be part of the solution. For more information, check out www.mcbc.mcbusiness.org and www.competitiveclusters.com.
Some thoughts on “green” certifications
Posted by Rob Nicely, Carmel Building & Design
There are many certification programs that recognize environmentally mindful design and building, including Passive House, LEED, Zero Net Energy and Living Building Challenge. Certifications provide a road map to achieving specific goals. But it doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing proposition. Little steps in the “green” direction really do make a difference. The most important thing any of us can do is to start learning more about, and embracing, the many options for “green” design, building and living.
Each home, each project offers different challenges and opportunities that require an innovative approach. Every day, we’re learning new techniques to achieve extreme energy efficiency and create healthier indoor environments. Finding ways to use more materials that are low/no VOC, sustainably grown, recycled, reclaimed and recyclable. And dedicating ourselves to ensuring each client has a home that’s durable, comfortable and functional, and supports their commitment to “green” living.
Whether you’re a homeowner, designer, architect, builder or simply have an interest in our impact on the planet, you can make a difference.
Advanced Framing Techniques save energy, money, and the planet.
Posted by Rob Nicely, Carmel Building & Design
Advanced Framing Techniques (aka Optimal Value Engineered Framing) have been around since the late ‘70s, but have been slow to make the mainstream of the building industry. Until now. We’re happy to report that a growing number of builders are embracing these techniques. And for many good reasons.
• Does away with framing materials (about a 20% reduction) that serve no structural purpose, reducing waste and costs.
• For every piece of unneeded lumber, builders pay three times—to purchase, to move around and to recycle or send to the landfill.
• It’s a smarter use of wood, saving trees and forests.
• Many techniques improve air sealing and reduce drywall cracking, saving on labor and repair costs.
• Leaves additional room for insulation and eliminates cold spots, making the house more comfortable and energy efficient. Heat moves through wood four times faster than standard insulation materials, causing thermal bridging.
There’s a lot of interesting and useful info out there. The point is to start the journey to smarter, more environmentally mindful building. Otherwise we’ll never get there.